A Comprehensive Review of MCDM Methods, Applications, and Emerging Trends

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31181/dma31202569

Keywords:

Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making, Artificial Intelligence, Fuzzy Logic, Real-time Decision-making, Hybrid Models, Sustainability Metrics

Abstract

Multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches have become vital for tackling complicated, multi-objective decision-making issues in dynamic and unpredictable situations. This paper covers the history of MCDM methodologies, ranging from conventional methods like the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) to sophisticated innovations embracing fuzzy logic, hybrid models, and artificial intelligence (AI). It analyses the numerous uses of MCDM in business, engineering, healthcare, and environmental management, highlighting their adaptation to both qualitative and quantitative criteria. The approaches adopted include an examination of conventional and current frameworks, identifying their strengths and shortcomings. Emerging technologies such as integrating Blockchain, the Internet of Things, and big data analytics are studied, revealing their potential for real-time and dynamic decision-making. Key findings underscore the limitations of uncertainty modeling, computational complexity, and scalability while also revealing potential for multidisciplinary research and sustainability-focused applications.  This study finds by offering actionable recommendations for researchers and practitioners, advocating for the establishment of AI-integrated, real-time decision-making frameworks and standardized evaluation standards to address contemporary challenges and enhance the practical relevance of MCDM methods.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aruldoss, M., Lakshmi, T. M., & Venkatesan, V. P. (2013). A Survey on Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods and Its Applications. American Journal of Information Systems, 1(1), 31-43. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajis-1-1-5.

Cao, L., & Liang, J. (2011). Multi-criteria decision making based on Vague integral. Journal of Computer Applications, 31(4), 1111-1113. https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1087.2011.01111.

Kaya, İ., Çolak, M., & Terzi, F. (2018). Use of MCDM techniques for energy policy and decision-making problems: A review. International Journal of Energy Research, 42(7), 2344-2372. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.4016.

Morkūnaitė, Ž., & Podvezko, V. (2019). Criteria Evaluation for Contractor Selection in Cultural Heritage Projects Using Multiple Criteria Approach. In 17th International Colloquium „Sustainable Decisions in Built Environment. https://doi.org/10.3846/colloquium.2019.001.

Azadfallah, M. (2018). Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Ranking Decision Making Units. International Journal of Productivity Management and Assessment Technologies, 6(1), 17-36. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijpmat.2018010102.

Zopounidis, C., & Doumpos, M. (2002). Multi-criteria decision aid in financial decision making: methodologies and literature review. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 11(4-5), 167-186. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.333.

Chakravorty, S., & Ghosh, S. (2009). Power Distribution Planning Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method. International Journal of Computer and Electrical Engineering, 1(5), 596-601. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijcee.2009.v1.92.

Unal, O., & Maleki, E. (2018). Shot peening optimization with complex decision-making tool: Multi criteria decision-making. Measurement, 125, 133-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.04.077.

Alsheref, F. K. (2019). Route Recommendation Model Via An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 11(9), 17-24. https://doi.org/10.5373/jardcs/v11i9/20192768.

Ren, L., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., & Sun, Z. (2010). Comparative Analysis of a Novel M-TOPSIS Method and TOPSIS. Applied Mathematics Research Express, 2007, abm005. https://doi.org/10.1093/amrx/abm005.

Abad, P., Benito, S., & López, C. (2014). A comprehensive review of Value at Risk methodologies. The Spanish Review of Financial Economics, 12(1), 15-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srfe.2013.06.001.

Zhang, X., & Xu, Z. (2014). Extension of TOPSIS to Multiple Criteria Decision Making with Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 29(12), 1061-1078. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21676.

Salih, M. M., Zaidan, B. B., Zaidan, A. A., & Ahmed, M. A. (2019). Survey on fuzzy TOPSIS state-of-the-art between 2007 and 2017. Computers & Operations Research, 104, 207-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2018.12.019.

Brans, J. P., Vincke, Ph., & Mareschal, B. (1986). How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research, 24(2), 228-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-5.

Oubahman, L., & Duleba, S. (2021). Review of PROMETHEE method in transportation. Production Engineering Archives, 27(1), 69-74. https://doi.org/10.30657/pea.2021.27.9.

Zyoud, S. H., & Fuchs-Hanusch, D. (2017). A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS techniques. Expert Systems with Applications, 78, 158-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.02.016.

Govindan, K., & Jepsen, M. B. (2016). ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 250(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.019.

Marzouk, M. M. (2011). ELECTRE III model for value engineering applications. Automation in Construction, 20(5), 596-600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.11.026.

Khan, A. U., & Ali, Y. (2020). Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Analytic Network Process Methods and Their Applications: A Twenty-Year Review From 2000-2019. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v12i3.822.

Behzadian, M., KhanmohammadiOtaghsara, S., Yazdani, M., & Ignatius, J. (2012). A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(17), 13051-13069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.056.

Biswas, A., Gazi, K. H., & Mondal, S. P. (2024). Finding Effective Factor for Circular Economy Using Uncertain MCDM Approach. Management Science Advances, 1(1), 31-52. https://doi.org/10.31181/msa1120245.

da Silva Wegner, R., Pentiado Godoy, L., Pedroso Serpa, N., Martinelli, M., & Pentiado Godoy, T. (2018). Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in the analysis of marketing mix in a construction material company. Revista Gestão Da Produção Operações e Sistemas, 13(2), 299-320. https://doi.org/10.15675/gepros.v13i2.1884.

Büyüközkan, G., & Çifçi, G. (2012). A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 3000-3011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.162.

Kumar, R. (2024). Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven Transformation: Sustainable Development of Agro-based Industries in Bihar. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i02.15935.

Abid, M., & Saqlain, M. (2024). Optimizing Diabetes Data Insights Through Kmapper-Based Topological Networks: A Decision Analytics Approach for Predictive and Prescriptive Modeling. Management Science Advances, 1(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.31181/msa1120241.

Krohling, R. A., & Pacheco, A. G. C. (2015). A-TOPSIS – An Approach Based on TOPSIS for Ranking Evolutionary Algorithms. Procedia Computer Science, 55, 308-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.054.

Wang, T.-C., & Lee, H.-D. (2009). Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(5), 8980-8985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.035.

Hajkowicz, S., & Collins, K. (2006). A Review of Multiple Criteria Analysis for Water Resource Planning and Management. Water Resources Management, 21(9), 1553-1566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9112-5.

Beshah, B., &Kitaw, D. (2013). AHP application in a financial institution. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v5i1.135.

Naseh, H. (2018). Space mission definition based on analytical hierarchy process (AHP) METHOD. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v10i2.583.

Kahraman, C. (2018). A Brief Literature Review for Fuzzy AHP. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v10i2.599.

Kumar, S., & Kumar, R., (2024). Exploring Consumer Perceptions in Online Shopping for Sustainable Economic Development. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i02.16888.

Kumar, R. (2024). Exploring Entrepreneurial Competencies for Enhancing Performance in Agro-Based MSMEs: A Case Study from Bihar. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i06.29733.

Kumar, S., & Kumar, R., (2024). The Impact of Digital Content Marketing on the Performance of Five-star Hotels in India. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i02.16861.

Kumar, A., Kumar, R., & Anwar, P. (2024). The Crucial Role of Commercial Banks in Financial Inclusion and Entrepreneurial Development. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i02.17146.

Aksoz, E. O., Özel, Ç. H., & Akoğlan Kozak, M. (2015). An analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for understanding convention planners’ prior factors of convention hotel selection. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v7i2.283.

Wijnmalen, D. J. D., & Wedley, W. C. (2008). Non-discriminating criteria in the AHP: removal and rank reversal. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 15(5-6), 143-149. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.430.

Bray, F., Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Siegel, R. L., Torre, L. A., & Jemal, A. (2018). Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 68(6), 394-424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492.

Manyaga, F., Yasmin, M., Nilufer, N., & Hajaoui, Z. (2020). A systematic literature review on multi-criteria decision making in disaster management. International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), 2(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.36096/ijbes.v2i2.197.

Ishak, A., & Wanli. (2020). Analysis of Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Methods in Multi Criteria Decision Making: Literature Review. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1003, 012147. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1003/1/012147.

Figueira, J. R., Greco, S., Roy, B., & Słowiński, R. (2012). An Overview of ELECTRE Methods and their Recent Extensions. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 20(1-2), 61-85. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1482.

Russo, R. de F. S. M., & Camanho, R. (2015). Criteria in AHP: A Systematic Review of Literature. Procedia Computer Science, 55, 1123-1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.081.

Kumar, R., & Khan, A. K. (2024). Supply Chain Sustainability and SDG Compliance: Challenges and Opportunities for Agro-Based Industries. Sustainable Development Goals & Business Sustainability, 442-472.

Ruoslahti, H., & Trent, A. (2020). Organizational Learning in the Academic Literature – Systematic Literature Review. Information & Security: An International Journal, 46(1), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.11610/isij.4605.

Abdolazimi, A., Montazeri, M., & Momeni, M. (2014). Ranking Plant Species for Stabilizing SandDune to Combat Desertification by Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods of ELECTRE and LINEAR Assignment. Asian Social Science, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n1p119.

Durucasu, H., Aytekin, A., Saraç, B., & Orakçı, E. (2017). Current application fields of ELECTRE and PROMETHEE: A literature review. Alphanumeric Journal, 5(2), 229-270. https://doi.org/10.17093/alphanumeric.320235.

Ramezanian, R. (2019). Estimation of the profiles in posteriori ELECTRE TRI: A mathematical programming model. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 128, 47-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.12.034.

Kumar, R. (2024). Optimizing Business Efficiency through Strategic Cost Management: A Framework for Profit Maximization in SMEs. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i06.31845.

Kumar, R., & Kumari, K. (2024). Enhancing Economic Development through Inventory Management Optimization in Agro-based Industries in Bihar: A Comparative Study of EOQ and EPQ Models. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i02.16892.

Kumar, R., Khan, A. K., & Goel, S. (2024). From farm to table: How AI is revolutionizing demand forecasting in agro-based industries. Blockchain and AI In Business, 81.

Published

2025-01-01

How to Cite

Kumar, R. (2025). A Comprehensive Review of MCDM Methods, Applications, and Emerging Trends. Decision Making Advances, 3(1), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.31181/dma31202569